Showing posts with label haiti. Show all posts
Showing posts with label haiti. Show all posts
Friday, August 20, 2010
Reuters: Wyclef Jean Ineligible to Run for Haiti Presidency
Reuters is reporting that hip hop star and aspiring politician Wyclef Jean failed to meet eligibility requirements to run for president of Haiti. Election officials released their ruling Friday evening.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Lawyer for Idaho Kidnappers Possibly Tied to Trafficking Ring
The El Salvadoran government is conducting an investigation to determine whether Jorge Puello, a lawyer for 10 Americans accused of attempted kidnapping in Haiti, is connected to a trafficking and prostitution ring. The Haitian judge presiding over the criminal case has also initiated an investigation into the matter.
The 10 Americans, who are members of an Idaho Baptist sect, say they only intended to "rescue" the children from the earthquake-ravished country, and several news articles have portrayed the group in sympathetic terms. Dissenting Justice, however, has argued that this type of behavior is absolutely unacceptable and goes against the legal standards for treating children in every civilized country. The earthquake and poverty in Haiti should not invalidate established legal norms that protect children from exploitation. Indeed, poor children are among the most vulnerable for exploitation and abuse.
This Is Not A "Politically Charged" Case
In its latest coverage of the case, the New York Times reports that the prosecution of the Americans is "politically charged." The article, however, does not offer any evidence to support this claim. An earlier New York Times article similarly described the case as being "fraught with diplomatic and political land mines."
Perhaps the New York Times believes that it is inherently a matter of politics for an impoverished nation to prosecute a clear case involving crimes against innocent children if the defendants are Americans. I disagree. Also, the State Department has rebuffed a request by the group to negotiate a release.
The United States prosecutes foreign nationals routinely, without the major media, including the New York Times, describing the cases as politically charged. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the infamous "underwear bomber," is a religious foreign national subject to prosecution in the United States for trying to harm innocent Americans. Most media would not consider his prosecution "politically charged." It is unclear what distinguishes these two cases in that regard.
For more on the story of the 10 Americans, see: So God Authorized Attempted Mass Kidnapping? Give Me a Break!
For more on the possible tie between the group and a suspected human trafficker, see: Adviser to Detained Americans in Haiti Is Investigated.
The 10 Americans, who are members of an Idaho Baptist sect, say they only intended to "rescue" the children from the earthquake-ravished country, and several news articles have portrayed the group in sympathetic terms. Dissenting Justice, however, has argued that this type of behavior is absolutely unacceptable and goes against the legal standards for treating children in every civilized country. The earthquake and poverty in Haiti should not invalidate established legal norms that protect children from exploitation. Indeed, poor children are among the most vulnerable for exploitation and abuse.
This Is Not A "Politically Charged" Case
In its latest coverage of the case, the New York Times reports that the prosecution of the Americans is "politically charged." The article, however, does not offer any evidence to support this claim. An earlier New York Times article similarly described the case as being "fraught with diplomatic and political land mines."
Perhaps the New York Times believes that it is inherently a matter of politics for an impoverished nation to prosecute a clear case involving crimes against innocent children if the defendants are Americans. I disagree. Also, the State Department has rebuffed a request by the group to negotiate a release.
The United States prosecutes foreign nationals routinely, without the major media, including the New York Times, describing the cases as politically charged. Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the infamous "underwear bomber," is a religious foreign national subject to prosecution in the United States for trying to harm innocent Americans. Most media would not consider his prosecution "politically charged." It is unclear what distinguishes these two cases in that regard.
For more on the story of the 10 Americans, see: So God Authorized Attempted Mass Kidnapping? Give Me a Break!
For more on the possible tie between the group and a suspected human trafficker, see: Adviser to Detained Americans in Haiti Is Investigated.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
So God Authorized Attempted Mass Kidnapping? Give Me a Break!
Pat Robertson apparently believes that Haiti is a godless country devoid of any laws that a Christian needs to respect. But this asinine viewpoint should not excuse the ten Idaho Baptists who were recently arrested after they attempted to remove 33 children from Haiti without legal authority. The group allegedly tried to take the children to the Dominican Republic where they were to live in an orphanage that does not yet exist.
Some of the individuals claim that the children's parents "gave" their kids to the group because they hoped that the Americans could offer the children better lives. But children are not items of personal property that people -- including parents -- can simply discard. Instead, most countries, including Haiti, have formal adoption laws that create procedures to investigate the fitness of prospective adoptive parents or guardians and to make sure that biological parents knowingly and intentionally relinquish their parental rights. Given the number of exploited and abused children, it is easy to understand the sound public policy behind these laws.
If ten foreigners tried to yank 33 "needy" American children from their homes and secret them across the border for a "better life," the issue of intent would not matter, and the New York Times would not describe the group's subsequent domestic prosecution as one "fraught with diplomatic and political land mines." Neither ignorance of the law nor old-fashioned ignorance can excuse the bizarre and dangerous behavior of this group.
Some of the individuals claim that the children's parents "gave" their kids to the group because they hoped that the Americans could offer the children better lives. But children are not items of personal property that people -- including parents -- can simply discard. Instead, most countries, including Haiti, have formal adoption laws that create procedures to investigate the fitness of prospective adoptive parents or guardians and to make sure that biological parents knowingly and intentionally relinquish their parental rights. Given the number of exploited and abused children, it is easy to understand the sound public policy behind these laws.
If ten foreigners tried to yank 33 "needy" American children from their homes and secret them across the border for a "better life," the issue of intent would not matter, and the New York Times would not describe the group's subsequent domestic prosecution as one "fraught with diplomatic and political land mines." Neither ignorance of the law nor old-fashioned ignorance can excuse the bizarre and dangerous behavior of this group.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)